Talk:Game On Charles/@comment-25460429-20150326175222/@comment-9290937-20150326183046

I think that the letter was written horribly.I mean, she got the point but she didn't wrap it all up like she should have.Yes, there were many red herrings and I still doubt that Marlene planned ChArles since 301.She herself said she had 3 candidates and she went with ChArles early in 3A but I think that she didn't do it before 412 or even later.If she did, she wouldn't give so many red herrings and BW (what was her purpose anyway?I doubt it was ChArles but never say never...)

The point is, seasons 3&4 were  mix of random ideas like "Hey, let's make Toby A!Or let's give EzrA a chance to become relevant...and then irrelevant again..."I won't even mention the pig in the trunk thingy.

The author of the letter didn't include many examples and I think that Marlene deserves a "decent" open-letter with better arguments....This one was ok but it lacks some content.