Talk:Game On, Charles/@comment-5660329-20150516021116/@comment-5660329-20150516103914

Selena: idk if that was to me or not, but I don't feel like being in prison would've been a good choice. not only are the taxpayers paying to keep this man alive, sometimes there is a chance for criminals to get out based on "good behavior" and then go back to being a criminal (the rate on that is very high). the way I see it, a terrorist a terrorist and will never be redeemed.

WeAreAllA: I hope your brother is okay! That must've been so scary.

Fred: I don't really either, but it's either that or spending time in prison where taxpayers pay to keep criminals alive where they supposedly have everything they need to survive. That's how it works in American; idk if it's the same in Italy. people like that, or child molesters/murderers don't deserve to live. Especially not on taxpayers' money.

wazuuuuup: yes, killing a murderer is technically murdering them as well. However, it prevents them from killing even MORE people. It's kind of like killing in self defense. Yes, you're killing someone but it's to protect yourself or the people you love. In this case, it would be killing someone to protect society. You can either let a murderer be killed (I think they deserve it, tbh; think about if you were a family member of the victim: would you want them to stay in prison alive while your family member isn't? Would that feel like "justice" to you?  It certainly wouldn't to me.) or let them stay in jail where there's a chance for them to get out on good behavior and get right back to it (or get arrested for another crime) within a year less. The rate can be as high as 80%. It's called "recidivism". Think of all the people that person can kill if they get out. In jail, they won't be hurting anyone unless they get out, like I said. If you kill them, they won't get that chance to hurt anyone ever again.

That being said: I respect everyone's opinions, but I'm going to have to disagree with the people who said death isn't right for them.