Talk:Game On, Charles/@comment-5660329-20150516021116/@comment-26140471-20150518034253

We don't have the death penalty in New Zealand, usually I'm against the deah penalty, but like Tina, I think that terroism is the exception. There is no justification for what he did. I know that some murderers aren't pure evil, and have a chance to redeem themselves, but it's not like that with him. He didn't show one ounce of remorse, and I know that he will probably always be the same way. I don't think people like him deserve a place in the society, quite frankly he's too dangerous. Most of the time I think that death penalty is the easy way out for the criminals, as they don't really get to think about what they did, and they don't really suffer. It seems like an exit from a lifetime of really strict and and labourous imprisonment. I know it might not be like that for all criminals, but I do think that some criminals would probably want to take the easier way out, but others might not. Amanda's right when she talks about tax payers. It may be the easiest way out for the criminals, but it is also the cheapest way out for the taxpayer, the taxpayer must support the criminals while they are in prison. I still think that terroism is my only exception, because I think their are some criminals who deserve a chance to redeem themselves. But I don't think that terrorists, or mass murderers (unless mentally insane) deserve a place in the society. They are too much of a risk to society. In countries like Bali drug traffickers (if caught) can get the death penalty (not murderers.) What are your guys opinion on that?