Talk:'A' is for A-l-i-v-e/@comment-108.181.251.179-20130324054425

So Alison or Courtney, whoever Red Coat is, didn't want the liars dead, so we can deduce a few things from this:

- Red Coat didn't start the fire

- The fire was most likely started by the second A-Team/the Jenna/Melissa/Shana alliance.

- The fire was most likely intended for the A-Team and the liars because when the gloved person locked the girls in, he/she knew at that point that both Mona and the liars were in there. It wouldn't make sense for it to be only intended for Mona's team, because a) this second A-Team must have known that Red Coat would arrive after the liars arrive, which would put the liars in danger as well if they wanted to kill Red Coat b) Due to Toby's situation, it wouldn't make sense because

I) If the second A-Team had known that apparently Toby is a double agent, and since they must have known that Red Coat wouldn't arrive until after the liars arrive, they wouldn't say "bitches" because in that case Mona would be the only person in the house, but they used the plurial...

II) Now if Toby is lying about his double agent status or if the second A-Team simply didn't know that he was a double agent, it still wouldn't make sense because the gloved person obviously saw Toby and Spencer walk outside of the lodge before he/she started the fire

So we can conclude that:

1) The Second A-Team, good or bad, probably intended the fire for both the A-Team and the Liars (well in this case Mona and the Liars).

2) The Second A-Team obviously isn't good based on this

3) Red Coat was not planning to set fire to the lodge and kill the girls, as she saved the girls, meaning Red Coat may be good, along with her A-Team, and is most likely against the second A-Team. All we know is that she wanted the girls together at the lodge.

4) There may be more then one Red Coat