Talk:How the 'A' Stole Christmas/@comment-25584522-20141204160424/@comment-25755332-20141204220417

^ Uber-A, It's fun that someone share the same theories =)

I know, this makes sense. Nothing with Ali's attempted murder seems to have anything to do with NAT after all, it seems like a dead end. I also think that NAT-club is the one responsible for killing off members, both Ian and Garrett and that doesn't have to do with Ali at all. It could have to do with the videos content in general, for example the videos of Toby and Jenna and the girls. To me her murder is most likely to have some connection to Radley. And the writers probably want us to see and believe that Ali is the centre of the story. In some way she is, but I actually believe Radley is the one with the answers that we currently are missing. Like I said before the NAT-videos could just be some B-plot to make us believe that they somehow are responsible for what happened to Ali, but I think something related to Radley is the real ones that are responsible. And also if this whole story was only about Ali's attempted murder, it would probably be over already. I think there's a bigger picture, we haven't seen yet. So what I'm saying is that Radley and NAT haven't nothing to do with each other, it's just two plotlines existing on the same time. With different motives, targets and purpose. And if NAT is the ones who are responsible for everything, the videos we haven't must contain really R-rated material or contain secrets that could destroy everything. Both Ian and Melissa refer to the videos and say that it could bring everybody down. What are they referring to? Something we already know or bigger cover-ups? Ian also said that it could bring down Ali's family too, what's up with that? And why would Ian want to have all that information in the first place?